From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarkington v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
NO. CV 12-4849-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CV 12-4849-JAK(E)

05-08-2013

ANTHONY L. TARKINGTON, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM SMITH JR., DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY; MARY SANCHEZ, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend as against both Defendant Sanchez and Defendant Smith: (a) with prejudice to the extent the Complaint challenges Defendants' alleged actions or inactions with regard to Plaintiff's postconviction requests for DNA testing; and (b) without prejudice as to Plaintiff's claims challenging the validity of his conviction.

____________________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tarkington v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
NO. CV 12-4849-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Tarkington v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. TARKINGTON, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM SMITH JR., DEPUTY DISTRICT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

NO. CV 12-4849-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)