From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. CV:10-4945 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV:10-4945 SI Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI

10-24-2011

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547) CROWELL & MORING LLP Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice) R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice) ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524) Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694) SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON Eric S. O'Connor (SBN 223244) SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Counsel for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.


Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)

Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,

Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp

Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;

and Newegg Inc.

[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT, WAIVER

OF SERVICE, AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Whereas, plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg Inc. ("Plaintiffs") filed a second amended complaint ("SAC") in the above-captioned case adding as defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., and Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. (the "Newly Named Defendants") on September 9, 2011;

Whereas, Plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the Newly Named Defendants;

Whereas, the Newly Named Defendants wish to confirm a date certain for their time to respond to the SAC; and

Whereas the parties wish to set a briefing schedule if the Newly Named Defendants elect to file motions to dismiss the SAC.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and the Newly Named Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:

1. The Newly Named Defendants waive service of the SAC under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Newly Named Defendants of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

2. The deadline for the Newly Named Defendants to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the SAC will be November 18, 2011.

3. If the Newly Named Defendants file motions to dismiss the SAC, any such motions shall be heard on the following schedule:

Oppositions to be filed by: December 14, 2011

Replies to be filed by: December 23, 2011

Hearing Date: January 6, 2012

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)

Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)

Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)

R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)

Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)

ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP

Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,

Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp

Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;

and Newegg Inc.

Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)

Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON

Eric S. O'Connor (SBN 223244)

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON

Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.

and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Counsel for Defendant Philips Electronics North

America Corporation

Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203)

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice)

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics

Co., Ltd.

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Eric S. O'Connor, Brendan P. Cullen and Allison A. Davis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Susan Illston, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. CV:10-4945 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Target Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Target Corporation, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV:10-4945 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)