From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tardif v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

13-CV-4056 (KMW)

05-11-2022

MARY TARDIF, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.


ORDER

KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge.

Two motions for reconsideration are the subject of this Order.

First, Defendant has moved for reconsideration of the Court's ruling regarding the admissibility of Plaintiff's testimony that John Doe No. 8 pushed Plaintiff on March 21, 2012, prior to her interaction with then-Sergeant Mattera. (ECF No. 456.) Included in Defendant's motion were four exhibits. By May 12, 2022, at 5 p.m., Defendant must submit, in addition to the four exhibits it already submitted, all excerpts from the 2018 pre-trial conference and 2018 trial transcripts that would be relevant to Defendant's motion. By May 12, 2022 at 5 p.m., Plaintiff may submit a memorandum of law in opposition to this motion. This memorandum is not to exceed eight double-spaced pages. Plaintiff may also include transcript excerpts that would be relevant.

Second, Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of the Court's ruling regarding the admissibility of the NYPD Patrol Guide § 203-11. (ECF No. 459.) By May 13, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., Defendant may submit a memorandum of law in opposition to this motion. This memorandum is not to exceed eight double-spaced pages.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tardif v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2022
13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Tardif v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARY TARDIF, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

13-CV-4056 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2022)