From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarbox v. National Biscuit Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

December, 1922.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think the language complained of was slanderous per se, and, therefore, no allegation of special damage was necessary. Rich, Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tarbox v. National Biscuit Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

Tarbox v. National Biscuit Company

Case Details

Full title:LEONORE TARBOX, Respondent, v. NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY and HARRY HATTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1922

Citations

204 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)