Opinion
No. 81095
05-20-2020
MAYRA ARACELI TARANGO, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate her judgement of conviction and allowing her to withdraw her guilty plea and proceed to a jury trial.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support her claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).
We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Pickering /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Mayra Araceli Tarango
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk