Opinion
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02019-RPM.
November 20, 2009
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE
Upon consideration of the filed papers in support and opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment and the motion to strike declarations and witnesses, the Court finds and concludes that there are sufficient showings of evidentiary support to warrant an inference that the plaintiff's termination of his employment was in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and in retaliation for his protesting a proposal that may have been in violation of established public policy. The defendant's motion to strike declarations and witnesses is unfounded. It is
ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment and the defendant's motion to strike declarations and witnesses are denied.