From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taplin v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 27, 2016
No. SA CV 15-01375-CJC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. SA CV 15-01375-CJC (DFM)

07-27-2016

GARRETT EDWARD TAPLIN, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.


Second Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. /// /// /// /// ///

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: July 27, 2016

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Taplin v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 27, 2016
No. SA CV 15-01375-CJC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Taplin v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:GARRETT EDWARD TAPLIN, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 27, 2016

Citations

No. SA CV 15-01375-CJC (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2016)