From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tapio Inv. v. State

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 8, 2017
187 Wn. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93906-3

03-08-2017

TAPIO INVESTMENT, et al., Petitioners, v. The STATE of Washington, Respondent.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 7, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Tapio Inv. v. State

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 8, 2017
187 Wn. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

Tapio Inv. v. State

Case Details

Full title:TAPIO INVESTMENT, et al., Petitioners, v. The STATE of Washington…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 8, 2017

Citations

187 Wn. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2017)
187 Wash. 2d 1024
390 P.3d 331

Citing Cases

Margitan v. Spokane Reg'l Health Dist.

Because a permit does not qualify under this standard, we deny the Margitans' motion. See Tapio Inv. Co. I v.…