From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tantum v. Keller

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 672 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Decided October 20th, 1924.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 95 N.J. Eq. 466.

Mr. Cassel R. Ruhlman, for the respondent.

Mr. James J. McGoogan, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Tantum v. Keller

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 672 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Tantum v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:HARRY H. TANTUM, respondent, v. ANNA KELLER, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 1924

Citations

96 N.J. Eq. 672 (N.J. 1924)

Citing Cases

Westfield Centre Serv. v. Cities Serv. Oil Co.

N.J.S.A. 56:10-6. Its view of these rights is misplaced. Contractually, a franchisor could have prohibited…

Wellmore Builders, Inc. v. Wannier

The preemptioner's right to a conveyance depends upon the grantor's either notifying him that he desires to…