Tantum v. Binz

Full title: WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 18, 1982

452 A.2d 667 (N.J. 1982)

452 A.2d 667

Opinion

Argued September 28, 1982 —

Decided October 18, 1982.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Laurence M. McHeffey argued the cause for appellant ( Hanlon, Dempsey McHeffey, attorneys).

Hugh Porter argued the cause for respondent ( Enright, Porter Lenney, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J. Super. 296, 302 (1981).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 6.

For affirmance — None.