From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tante v. Herring

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 7, 1994
451 S.E.2d 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

A93A1166.

DECIDED DECEMBER 7, 1994. RECONSIDERATION DENIED DECEMBER 20, 1994.

Legal malpractice. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Gibson.

Denney, Pease, Allison, Kirk Lomax, John W. Denney, for appellant.

Beltran Associates, Frank J. Beltran, Simone R. Siex, for appellees.


In Tante v. Herring, 264 Ga. 694 (___ S.E.2d ___) (1994), the Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of this court in Tante v. Herring, 211 Ga. App. 322 ( 439 S.E.2d 5). Therefore, our judgment in this appeal is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. Accordingly, that part of the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment on the Herrings' claims for legal malpractice and breach of contract is reversed, but that part of the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to the Herrings on their claim for breach of fiduciary duty is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the trial court so that the Herrings may pursue their claim for damages resulting from Tante's breach of his fiduciary duty.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

DECIDED DECEMBER 7, 1994 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED DECEMBER 20, 1994.


Summaries of

Tante v. Herring

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 7, 1994
451 S.E.2d 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Tante v. Herring

Case Details

Full title:TANTE v. HERRING et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 7, 1994

Citations

451 S.E.2d 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
451 S.E.2d 130