From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanoury v. Cancilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 14, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant Vincent Cancilla is entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint against him. An out-of-possession lessor is not liable for injuries that occur on the leased premises unless the lessor has retained a contractual responsibility to keep the premises in repair (Putnam v. Stout, 38 N.Y.2d 607, 617). In the present case, the tenant assumed the burden of maintaining the premises and the equipment; therefore, the lessor cannot be held liable for burns sustained by the tenant's employee when a pizza oven flashed over as the employee attempted to relight it. Although a lessor has a duty to warn a tenant of any latent defects in the premises (see, Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 63, at 436 [5th ed]; 46 N.Y. Jur, Premises Liability, § 23, at 68-71), in this case, defendant's wife told the tenant at the time of the lease that she had been burned in a similar incident involving the oven. Moreover, prior to plaintiff's accident, the tenant himself had been burned while attempting to relight the oven. Under these circumstances, the landlord is not liable for plaintiff's injuries. In light of this holding, it is unnecessary to reach the remaining issue raised by defendant.


Summaries of

Tanoury v. Cancilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Tanoury v. Cancilla

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY L. TANOURY, Respondent, v. VINCENT CANCILLA, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 91

Citing Cases

Sally Lu Fashions Corp. v. A-Chau Realty Corp.

Under such circumstances, the out-of-possession defendant-landlord is not responsible for plaintiffs' losses…

Flickner v. Hungerford

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because the absentee lessor retained no control of the…