From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanori v. Holland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 8, 2013
SACV 12-0880-VAP (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2013)

Opinion


SERGIO M. TANORI, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Acting Warden, Respondent. No. SACV 12-0880-VAP (DTB) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 8, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Tanori v. Holland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 8, 2013
SACV 12-0880-VAP (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Tanori v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:SERGIO M. TANORI, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Acting Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2013

Citations

SACV 12-0880-VAP (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2013)