Tanner v. Vogel

1 Citing case

  1. Di Prima v. Wagner

    27 Misc. 2d 380 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)

    No precedent is shown for such an emasculatory device, which would operate practically against the presently authorized local procedures which are found in the New York City Charter, for example. Though valid, perhaps in respect to the City Home Rule Law, it may not be so held as to the New York City Charter. The defendants cite Tanner v. Vogel ( 261 S.W.2d 671 [Ky.]) a case in which the Court of Appeals of Kentucky affirmed denial of mandamus against a County Judge acting as an election official. The Judge had refused to put competing proposals regarding local government of the City of Henderson, Kentucky, on the ballot.