From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 6, 2021
324 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-643

08-06-2021

Jenna Rae TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders case, we affirm Jenna Rae Tanner's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the cost imposed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2020). See Sorenson v. State , 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tanner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 6, 2021
324 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Tanner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jenna Rae TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)