From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 29, 2019
588 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107227

10-29-2019

Larry D. TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: James M. Dowd, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry D. Tanner (Movant) appeals the judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred because his conviction for stealing and seven-year sentence was unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Tanner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Oct 29, 2019
588 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Tanner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry D. TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

588 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)