From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. Merit Systems Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 26, 2010
No. 2010-3157 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-3157.

August 26, 2010.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DA0752090025-I-1.


ON MOTION ORDER

We construe the petitioner's notice of docketing as a motion to reform the official caption.

To the extent that the petitioner is seeking to reform the caption to designate the Office of Personal Management as a respondent, that request is denied. The Merit Systems Protection Board's decision did not involve the Office of Personnel Management as a party. Further, because the Board dismissed the underlying appeal for lack of jurisdiction, we designate the Board as the respondent. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2).

If petitioner is attempting to inform the court that her last name has changed to "Young," she should more clearly indicate that in writing to the court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied. The revised official caption is reflected above.


Summaries of

Tanner v. Merit Systems Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 26, 2010
No. 2010-3157 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Tanner v. Merit Systems Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:CASSANDRA TANNER, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 2010

Citations

No. 2010-3157 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2010)