From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. Hightower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2015
Case No. 6:14 CV 1035-TC (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:14 CV 1035-TC

01-23-2015

DANIEL J. TANNER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. VICKI HIGHTOWER, PAUL ZELLERBACH, JOHN HAWKINS and RIVERSIDE COUNTY, a subdivision of the State of California, John Does One through Ten, Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 31, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 23 day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tanner v. Hightower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2015
Case No. 6:14 CV 1035-TC (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Tanner v. Hightower

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL J. TANNER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. VICKI HIGHTOWER, PAUL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:14 CV 1035-TC (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2015)