From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanner v. Accor Hospitality

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 22, 2010
NO. 3-09-CV-2204-N (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2010)

Summary

listing necessary elements of ADA retaliation claim

Summary of this case from Kreucher v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

Opinion

NO. 3-09-CV-2204-N.

March 22, 2010


ORDER


After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tanner v. Accor Hospitality

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 22, 2010
NO. 3-09-CV-2204-N (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2010)

listing necessary elements of ADA retaliation claim

Summary of this case from Kreucher v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice
Case details for

Tanner v. Accor Hospitality

Case Details

Full title:CAS TANNER Plaintiff, v. ACCOR HOSPITALITY Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 22, 2010

Citations

NO. 3-09-CV-2204-N (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Kreucher v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

See Dottin v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice, 627 F. App'x 397 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (affirming…