From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannenbaum v. National Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 450 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

June 19, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, XAVIER C. RICCOBONO, J.

Maurice L. Noyer for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


Tariffs of carriers filed and approved pursuant to the Civil Aeronautic Act which limit liability for baggage transported in interstate commerce and checked on air-line tickets are valid where excess valuation can be declared and paid for even though the passenger's attention was not specifically called to the limitation and regardless whether the action is one in negligence, or for breach of a bailment contract or conversion ( Barstow v. New York, New Haven Hartford R.R. Co., 158 App. Div. 665; Beaumont v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 284 App. Div. 354, affd. 308 N.Y. 920, cert. denied 350 U.S. 838; Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, 189 F.2d 939; Wilkes v. Braniff Airways, 288 P.2d 377 [Okla.]).

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $100, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Concur — STEUER, J.P., HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

Tannenbaum v. National Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 450 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Tannenbaum v. National Airlines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY TANNENBAUM, Respondent, v. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1958

Citations

13 Misc. 2d 450 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
176 N.Y.S.2d 400

Citing Cases

Eastern Air Lines v. Williamson

An airline tariff which limits its liability for lost baggage is valid and binding. Lichten v. Eastern…

Rosenschein v. Trans World Airlines

Such provisions have been held to be a part of the contract of carriage, and valid and binding upon the…