From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannenbaum v. Carvel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1946
271 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

October 7, 1946.


Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Order insofar as it denied plaintiff's application to examine the defendant in respect of damages under item 5 of his notice of motion, and insofar as it denied him a discovery and inspection in respect of all items set out in his demand, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. The subject matter upon which examination before trial and discovery and inspection was sought is an integral part of the plaintiff's cause of action. The action being one at law and on contract, such an examination and discovery and inspection have long been sanctioned. ( Burns v. Lipson, 204 App. Div. 643; Cohen v. Cohen, 267 App. Div. 918; Saper v. National Bank of Far Rockaway, 265 App. Div. 941.) Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tannenbaum v. Carvel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1946
271 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Tannenbaum v. Carvel

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS TANNENBAUM, Appellant, v. BRUCE CARVEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1946

Citations

271 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Ventz v. Kaltenbach

The action being one at law and on contract the plaintiff is entitled to the examination under item 5 and to…

Nicoll v. Columbia Broadcasting System

(Cf. Tannenbaum v. Carvel, 271 A.D. 790; Cohen v. Cohen, 267 A.D. 918, and Mendelsohn v. Mendelsohn, 259 A.D.…