From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannehill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 10, 1998
712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-3666

Opinion filed June 10, 1998. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1998

An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Richard G. Payne, Judge. L.T. Nos. 92-30210, 92-00913, 91-00653, 91-00629 91-00621.

Eric Tannehill, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Upon the State's proper confession of error and our own review of the record, we reverse the defendant's sentences in Case Nos. 91-621 and 91-629 and remand for resentencing consistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement that all of the defendant's sentences would be served concurrent with each other and concurrent with any other sentence the defendant is presently serving, specifically Case Nos. 92-913 and 92-30210.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Tannehill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 10, 1998
712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Tannehill v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC TANNEHILL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 10, 1998

Citations

712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Turner v. State

This cause is remanded to the trial court to conform the written sentencing orders to the trial court's oral…

Jivanjee v. State

A written sentencing order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence. See Tannehill v.…