From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanksley v. Baker

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:21-cv-1977 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1977 KJM DB PS

10-18-2022

MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER BAKER, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBOFAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Moody Woodrow Tanksley is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed April 11, 2022, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file the amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court's order in a timely manner could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Tanksley v. Baker

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 18, 2022
2:21-cv-1977 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Tanksley v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER BAKER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-1977 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2022)