From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Mar 26, 2019
No. 04-18-00211-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-18-00211-CV

03-26-2019

Nancy L. TANKERSLEY and Charlie R. Tankersley, Appellants v. TRIPLE I. RANCHES, A TEXAS PARTNERSHIP, Appellee


From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas
Trial Court No. 13940
Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On October 16, 2018, we issued an order abating this appeal because appellants, Charlie R. Tankersley and Nancy L. Tankersley, were in bankruptcy. Appellee Triple I Ranches has now filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. A certified copy of an order dismissing the bankruptcy action, and thereby lifting the automatic stay, is attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3(a). In its motion to reinstate, appellee also asks that we "issue such notices or orders as are necessary requiring Appellants to appear and to show cause why their appeal should not be dismissed for Appellants' failure to prosecute the appeal." Appellee also asks that we "dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution."

After review, we GRANT the motion to reinstate and ORDER the appeal reinstated on the court's active docket. However, we DENY appellee's request that we either issue a show cause order or dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Until this court reinstated the appeal pursuant to this order, appellants could not prosecute the appeal due to the abatement order. When the appeal was abated, appellants' brief was due after we had granted their first motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we order appellants to file their brief in this court on or before April 25, 2019.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellants, who are pro se, and counsel for appellee.

According to appellees, one of the appellants, Charlie R. Tankersley, has passed away. If true, this does not affect the appeal. Rule 7.1(a)(1) provides that if a party to a civil case dies after the trial court renders judgment, but before the appeal is finally disposed, the appellate court shall proceed to adjudicate the appeal as if all parties were alive, the appellate court's judgment will have the same force and effect as if rendered when all parties were living, and the decedent's name may be used on all papers. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.1(a)(1).

/s/_________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Mar 26, 2019
No. 04-18-00211-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches

Case Details

Full title:Nancy L. TANKERSLEY and Charlie R. Tankersley, Appellants v. TRIPLE I…

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

No. 04-18-00211-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)