From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tankersley v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 31, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv154/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv154/RV/EMT.

January 31, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated January 14, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Tankersley v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 31, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv154/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Tankersley v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. TANKERSLEY, Petitioner, v. SCOTT P. FISHER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv154/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Armstrong v. Grondolsky

Moreover, the only precedent this Court has located on the issue presented suggests that the Bureau of…