From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maersk Tankers v. Hous. Pilots

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Apr 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-106 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-106

04-03-2017

IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF MAERSK TANKERS, AS OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THE M/T CARLA MAERSK, FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, et al, Plaintiffs, v. HOUSTON PILOTS, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court is the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John Froeschner. On May 12, 2015, this case was referred to Judge Froeschner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 6. Pending before Judge Froeschner was Claimant and Counter-Defendant Capt. George C. Reeser, Jr.'s ("Reeser") Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Dkt. 269. On February 13, 2017, Judge Froeschner filed an Amended Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion is granted to the extent, if any, that Maersk Tankers AS ("Maersk") presently alleges a claim against Reeser in excess of $1,000.00 and that any such claim be dismissed without exemption of any liability of the Conti parties. Dkt. 297.

This Motion was converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 294.

The Amended Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 297) was entered to correct a clerical error in the original Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 296). The original Report and Recommendation was accordingly rescinded by a subsequent order. Dkt. 298. --------

No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Froeschner Amended Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;

(2) The Claimant/Counter-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as follows: Maersk's counterclaim against Reeser for negligence is dismissed without exemption of any liability of the Conti parties to the extent, if any, that the claim is in excess of $1,000.00. Maersk's counterclaim is subject to a $1,000.00 limitation pursuant to Rule 66.083 of the Texas Transportation Code.

SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 3rd day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

George C. Hanks Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Maersk Tankers v. Hous. Pilots

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Apr 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-106 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Maersk Tankers v. Hous. Pilots

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF MAERSK TANKERS, AS OWNER AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-106 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2017)