Opinion
22-35066
08-26-2022
DONALD A. TANGWALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LARRY D. COMPTON, Bankruptcy Trustee; CABOT CHRISTIANSON, Attorney, Attorney for Larry Compton; GARY A. SPRAKER, Bankruptcy Judge; FRED CORBIT, Bankruptcy Judge; KAY HILL, Anchorage Trustee Office; MARK WEBER, United States Trustee Office, Seattle, Washington, Defendants-Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court No. 4:18-cv-00007-SLG for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
Tangwall filed his notice of appeal and motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in docket No. 19-80175. This court reviewed Tangwall's notice of appeal and accompanying documents and allowed this appeal to proceed. Tangwall's motion to proceed IFP in this appeal is granted.
Donald A. Tangwall appeals pro se from the district court's supplemental order declaring him a vexatious litigant and entering a pre-filing review order against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles, 761 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in declaring Tangwall a vexatious litigant and entering a pre-filing review order against him because all of the requirements for entering a pre-filing review order were met. See id.
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).