From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Min Tang v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 13, 2019
2018-2188 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 13, 2019)

Opinion

2018-2188

09-13-2019

MIN TANG, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

GEORGE CHUZI, Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch, PC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. STEPHEN FUNG, Office of General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by KATHERINE MICHELLE SMITH, TRISTAN LEAVITT.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-1221-17-0763-W-1.

JUDGMENT

GEORGE CHUZI, Kalijarvi, Chuzi, Newman & Fitch, PC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. STEPHEN FUNG, Office of General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by KATHERINE MICHELLE SMITH, TRISTAN LEAVITT. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 13, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Min Tang v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 13, 2019
2018-2188 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Min Tang v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:MIN TANG, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 13, 2019

Citations

2018-2188 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 13, 2019)