Opinion
No. 11–P–459.
2012-11-21
Toan TANG v. John T. AGOGLIA & others.
By the Court (KANTROWITZ, SIKORA & RUBIN, JJ.).
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
The plaintiff, Toan Tang, appeals from an adverse ruling below concerning his suit alleging malfeasance on the part of the defendants dealing with his library rights.
As the Superior Court judge ruled:
“The court ... concludes that hearing is not required to address the matter raised in the proposed amended complaint and the defendants' motion to dismiss. Defendants' objection to the [plaintiff's] style of pleading is noted. With difficulty the court reviewed the substantive claims, and concludes that the alleged failings in the facilities library/law library during the period up to 2009, cannot support the claims of money damages as these claims are not actionable and must be dismissed per 12(b)(6).”
Like the judge below, we have reviewed all of the claims made by the plaintiff and find them to be without merit.
For this reason, as well as for substantially those in the brief of the defendants, we affirm.
Judgment affirmed.