From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tang Capital Partners, LP v. BRC Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2022
22-CV-3476 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3476 (RWL)

11-15-2022

TANG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP., Plaintiff, v. BRC Inc., Defendant.


ORDER

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having reviewed the parties' correspondence concerning BRC's document custodians, and having considered relevance and proportionality, it is hereby ordered that Defendant shall include as custodians Mr. Hafer and Mr. Davin but need not include Mr. Best. If further discovery reveals that Mr. Best has uniquely relevant material, Plaintiff may renew its request with respect to him. Plaintiff's request to file a reply is denied as moot.

This resolves the motions at Dkt. 39 and 41.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tang Capital Partners, LP v. BRC Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2022
22-CV-3476 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Tang Capital Partners, LP v. BRC Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TANG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP., Plaintiff, v. BRC Inc., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3476 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2022)