Opinion
March, 1934.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In affirming we have taken into consideration the judgment roll in the brokerage action. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Summaries of
Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for
Tanenbaum v. Herzfeld
Case Details
Full title:MORRIS TANENBAUM, Respondent, v. ABRAHAM HERZFELD, Also Known as ABE…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1934
Citations
241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)