From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo and Ironton R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

November, 1920.

Present — Clarke P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.


Order affirmed, without costs, and without passing upon the merits, for the reason that it does not appear that a temporary injunction is necessary for the preservation of the rights of the plaintiffs as claimed.


Summaries of

Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo and Ironton R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo and Ironton R.R

Case Details

Full title:LEON TANENBAUM and Another, Appellants, v. DETROIT, TOLEDO AND IRONTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1920

Citations

194 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)