From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tan v. Tan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 19, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which directed the defendant to pay 70% of the child's future college expenses; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court erred in directing the defendant to pay 70% of the child's future college expenses. At the time of trial, the child was 11 years old and was not attending college. There was no evidence as to his academic interest, ability, possible choice of college, or what his expenses might be. Consequently, the award for future college expenses was premature ( see, Matter of Whittaker v. Feldman, 113 A.D.2d 809, 811; see also, Matter of Walls v. Walls, 221 A.D.2d 925; LaBombardi v. LaBombardi, 220 A.D.2d 642; Friedman v. Friedman, 216 A.D.2d 204; Gilkes v. Gilkes, 150 A.D.2d 200).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tan v. Tan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Tan v. Tan

Case Details

Full title:GRATA TAN, Respondent, v. ABRAHAM G. T. TAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

NK v. MK

The father's responsibility to pay for the costs of college education for the youngest daughter will be held…

Nichols v. Nichols

Thus, the issue should be remitted to Supreme Court to determine whether any amount of plaintiff's pension…