From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tan v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 1, 2021
3:21-CV-00930 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-CV-00930

11-01-2021

HONGJIN TAN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, ET AL., Respondents


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing the petitioner's habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction, because the case is now moot. Doc. No. 14 at 2. The petitioner filed a Response to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Doc. No. 18. The petitioner “concurs with the Magistrate Judge's findings and has no opposition to this case being dismissed as moot.” Id.

The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing, Doc. No. 11, is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tan v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 1, 2021
3:21-CV-00930 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Tan v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:HONGJIN TAN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, ET AL., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 1, 2021

Citations

3:21-CV-00930 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)