From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tamrat v. Kaufman

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 12, 2022
20-cv-01324-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-01324-PJH

10-12-2022

HERMAN TAMRAT, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KAUFMAN, Defendant.


ORDER VACATING HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY

RE: DKT. NO. 102

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Appointed pro bono counsel in this case have filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff. See Dkt. 102. Before ruling on counsel's motion, the court will first give plaintiff an opportunity to file a response. Because plaintiff is in prison, the court will extend the time for plaintiff to file a response to the motion. Plaintiff shall have until October 31, 2022, to file a response to counsel's motion. Defendant may also file a response by the same deadline. Pro bono counsel may then file a reply within seven (7) days of any response briefs.

The court notes that counsel has filed a proof of service showing that plaintiff was mailed a copy of the motion to withdraw on September 30, 2022. See Dkt. 102-2. The court further directs pro bono counsel to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff.

The hearing set for November 3, 2022 is VACATED, and the motion will be decided on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tamrat v. Kaufman

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 12, 2022
20-cv-01324-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Tamrat v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN TAMRAT, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KAUFMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

Citations

20-cv-01324-PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2022)