Tameisha M. ex rel. T.M. v. Berryhill

1 Citing case

  1. Krystal H. ex rel. C.H. v. Saul

    Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00068 (W.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2020)

    Moreover, I share Krystal's concern that ALJ Robinson's credibility analysis "failed to build an 'accurate and logical bridge' from the evidence to [her] conclusion that [C.H.] ha[d] less than marked limitations" in the challenged domains. Tameisha M. o.b.o. T.M. v. Berryhill, 340 F. Supp. 3d 573, 578 (W.D. Va. 2018) (quoting Woods v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 686, 694 (4th Cir. 2018)); see Pl.'s Br. 15-20. For example, ALJ Robinson did not explain how she determined C.H. was "actively involved" in the Boy Scouts and his church youth group or that he could "complete . . . his chores, classwork, and homework" with minimal, age-appropriate redirection.