Summary
describing cross-examination as the "usual remedy" for a potential sequestration violation
Summary of this case from State v. PowersOpinion
No. 95-1615.
May 28, 1996.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 F. 3d 973.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.
U.S.
May 28, 1996
517 U.S. 1222 (1996)
Summaries of
Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.
U.S.
May 28, 1996
517 U.S. 1222 (1996)
describing cross-examination as the "usual remedy" for a potential sequestration violation
Summary of this case from State v. PowersCase details for
Tamburello v. Comm-Tract Corp.
Case Details
Full title:TAMBURELLO v. COMM-TRACT CORP. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 28, 1996
Citations
517 U.S. 1222 (1996)
Citing Cases
U.S. v. Zhitlovsky
Generally, courts have denied requests for greater particularity in 404(b) notice. See, e.g., United States…
Todd v. Weakley CountyBoth the United States Constitution and the Tennessee Constitution guarantee to citizens the equal protection…