From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tamari E. v. Auther L.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 17, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 79867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06939 2013-06942 Docket No. V-12233-07/11B V-12548-07/11B V-19268-11 P-19256-11 V-29660-11-12 M159335

07-17-2013

In the Matter of Tamari E. (Anonymous), respondent, v. Auther L. (Anonymous), appellant.


SCHEDULING ORDER

Appeals by Auther L. from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County, both dated May 22, 2013. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is

ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,

ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeals; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) if the appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeals, a motion in this Court for leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel, pursuant to the requirements of CPLR 1101. Such a motion must be supported by an affidavit from the appellant, stating either that he or she qualified for assigned counsel upon application to the Family Court and that his or her financial status has not changed since that time, or that he or she had retained counsel or appeared pro se in the Family Court, and listing his or her assets and income; or
(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeals; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions


Summaries of

Tamari E. v. Auther L.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 17, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 79867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Tamari E. v. Auther L.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tamari E. (Anonymous), respondent, v. Auther L…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 17, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 79867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)