From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tam v. Barry Callebaut USA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. C 12-5887 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-5887 PJH

03-26-2013

ANDY TAM, Plaintiff(s), v. BARRY CALLEBAUT USA LLC, Defendant(s).


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty-day period.

The March 28, 2013 case management conference is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tam v. Barry Callebaut USA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. C 12-5887 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Tam v. Barry Callebaut USA LLC

Case Details

Full title:ANDY TAM, Plaintiff(s), v. BARRY CALLEBAUT USA LLC, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-5887 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)