From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 & 13 Judicial Dist.
Nov 3, 2017
71 N.Y.S.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 2014–2397 Q C.

11-03-2017

TAM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP., as Assignee of Turner, Kimberly, Appellant, v. AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME, Respondent.

Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, LLP (Mitchell L. Kaufman, Esq.), for respondent.


Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, LLP (Mitchell L. Kaufman, Esq.), for respondent.

Present: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered September 9, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.

For the reasons stated in Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (––– Misc.3d ––––, 2017 N.Y. Slip Op –––– [appeal No.2014–2172 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 & 13 Judicial Dist.
Nov 3, 2017
71 N.Y.S.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home

Case Details

Full title:TAM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP., as Assignee of Turner, Kimberly, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 & 13 Judicial Dist.

Date published: Nov 3, 2017

Citations

71 N.Y.S.3d 925 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)