From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talmer Bank & Trust v. Parikh

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 17, 2014
852 N.W.2d 896 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 149061 149062. COA Nos. 312632 313122.

2014-09-17

TALMER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vrajmohan C. PARIKH and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants. Talmer Bank & Trust, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vrajmohan C. Parikh and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants.


Prior report: 304 Mich.App. 373, 848 N.W.2d 408.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that relies upon the choice-of-law standard for tort actions set forth in Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, Ltd., 454 Mich. 274, 562 N.W.2d 466 (1997), which does not control the instant contractual dispute. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Talmer Bank & Trust v. Parikh

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 17, 2014
852 N.W.2d 896 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Talmer Bank & Trust v. Parikh

Case Details

Full title:TALMER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vrajmohan C. PARIKH and Sivaji…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

852 N.W.2d 896 (Mich. 2014)