Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James

7 Citing cases

  1. Gray v. Gober

    365 S.E.2d 279 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 8 times

    This proposition is simply untenable." Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 343 ( 352 S.E.2d 179) (1986). Thus, while it cannot be said that the mound of dirt, under any set of circumstances, could not be the proximate cause of appellant's injuries, it was affirmatively established under the circumstances shown that appellant's injuries were not caused by any negligence on the part of appellee.

  2. Wang v. Dukes

    368 Ga. App. 661 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)   Cited 3 times

    Compare Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James , 181 Ga. App. 341, 352 S.E.2d 179 (1986) (physical precedent only), which was cited by the defendants and which held that there was no genuine issue of fact as to whether a driver who braked but could not avoid a collision in his own lane of travel with another vehicle that swerved into his lane. See id. at 342, 352 S.E.2d 179.

  3. Hunsucker v. Belford

    304 Ga. App. 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that a driver, who injured a pedestrian, was entitled to summary judgment when "the only evidence as to [the defendant’s] manner of driving was that he drove within the speed limit on a familiar road at night in mist and, after cresting a hill, could not avoid a black-clothed pedestrian stepping into his lane"

    We find distinct Thompson v. Walker, 162 Ga. App. 292, 292 ( 290 SE2d 490) (1982), relied upon by Belford, which found a factual issue in a similar scenario based on the evidence that there was nothing obstructing the defendant's view on a "straight and almost level" road. Cf. Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 343 ( 352 SE2d 179) (1986) (physical precedent only). 2.

  4. Finney v. Machiz

    218 Ga. App. 771 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 15 times
    In Finney, a vehicle in which the plaintiff was a passenger swerved over the centerline of the road striking a van driven by the defendant.

    Machiz has failed to produce any evidence rebutting Finney's evidence that she was unable to avoid the collision through no fault of her own. See Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 343 ( 352 S.E.2d 179) (1986). Machiz herself cannot contradict the evidence because she has no memory of what happened immediately before, during, and immediately after the accident.

  5. Edmunds v. Cowan

    192 Ga. App. 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 6 times
    Reversing summary judgment on claim for negligentstorage of firearm claim against parent for adult child's use of parent's firearm

    Fort v. Boone, 166 Ga. App. 290, 292 ( 304 S.E.2d 465). Accordingly, material issues of fact remain which must be decided by a jury and, thus, summary judgment was improperly granted to Cowan. Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 342 ( 352 S.E.2d 179). This determination, however, should not be construed as authority for the proposition that appellant's evidence would, had it been offered at trial, necessarily be sufficient to withstand a motion for a directed verdict. Winn-Dixie v. Ramey, 186 Ga. App. 257, 258 ( 366 S.E.2d 785); see also Whelchel v. Laing Properties, 190 Ga. App. 182 ( 378 S.E.2d 478) (physical precedent).

  6. Jenkins v. Storey Trucking Company, Inc.

    362 S.E.2d 466 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 3 times

    We do not agree. "Although negligence cases are not frequently susceptible to final adjudication by motion for summary judgment, nevertheless, in cases of plain, palpable and indisputable evidence, summary judgment may be awarded. [Cits.]" Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 342 ( 352 S.E.2d 179) (1986). We find our holding in Fort v. Boone, 166 Ga. App. 290 ( 304 S.E.2d 465) (1983), although a physical precedent case, to be persuasive here. Fort was a wrongful death action arising from an automobile accident in which this court held that summary judgment was improperly denied to the defendant because "[t]here was no evidence showing lack of negligence on the part of [the plaintiff] and there was no factual establishment of probable negligence on the part of [the defendant]."

  7. Stroud v. Woodruff

    359 S.E.2d 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 12 times
    In Stroud v. Woodruff, 183 Ga. App. 628, 359 S.E.2d 680 (1987), the court had stated hypothetically that "any error which may have been committed by the trial court in charging on the doctrine of legal accident was rendered moot by the jury's verdict awarding damages to the appellant [plaintiff]...."

    This proposition is simply untenable." Tallman Pools of Ga. v. James, 181 Ga. App. 341, 343 ( 352 S.E.2d 179) (1986). Where the record contains no evidence of any negligence on the part of the plaintiff, "it is presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that plaintiff exercised due care. [Cit.