Opinion
No. 2D13–5842.
05-21-2014
Timothy Talley, pro se.
Timothy Talley, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Nesbitt v. State, 889 So.2d 801 (Fla.2004) ; DuBoise v. State, 520 So.2d 260 (Fla.1988) ; Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Desmond v. State, 576 So.2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) ; Budd v. State, 477 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) ; McMillan v. State, 832 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ; Hart v. State, 761 So.2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ; Graves v. State, 704 So.2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.