Opinion
Nos. 05-02-01116- CR 05-02-01117-CR
Opinion Filed August 11, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F00-54369-MS and F00-72056-WS. AFFIRMED
Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and MOSELEY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jansu Ray Talley appeals his convictions for possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than two hundred grams (cause number 05-02-01116-CR) and theft of property having a value of $1,500 or more but less than $20,000 (cause number 05-02-01117-CR). Appellant entered open guilty pleas to the charges and pleaded true to the two enhancement paragraphs in each indictment. The trial court found appellant guilty of both crimes and found all of the enhancement paragraphs true. In the cocaine case, the court assessed punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment. In the theft case, the court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the records showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.