James Talcott, Inc. v. United States Telephone Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Polygram, S.A. v. 32-03 Enterprises, Inc.

    697 F. Supp. 132 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)   Cited 14 times
    Holding invoices were a final written expression of the parties' agreement and could not be contradicted by extrinsic or parole evidence

    Pepper's Steel Alloys Inc. v. Lissner Minerals Metals, Inc., 494 F. Supp. 487, 496 (S.D.N.Y. 1979); Newburger-Morris Co. v. Talcott, 219 N.Y. 505, 511-12, 114 N.E. 846 (1916); Clune v. Healthco Medical, 78 A.D.2d 914, 433 N.Y.S.2d 52 (3rd Dept. 1980). Evidence of an account stated is, however, subject to refutation by proof of timely protest. James Talcott, Inc. v. U.S. Tel. Co., 52 A.D.2d 197, 201, 383 N.Y.S.2d 39 (1st Dept. 1976). (If defendant makes constant oral objections to plaintiff, which are accepted and acted upon, there may be questions as to whether plaintiff waived his right to insist upon timely written objections.)