Summary
In Simpson v. Talbot, 72 Ark. 185, 79 S.W. 761, Mr. Justice Battle said: "The Chancery Court had the authority to amend the record of its decree at a subsequent term, so as to make it speak the truth, but it cannot do so without notice first given to the party against whom it is made. Martin v. State Bank, 20 Ark. 636; Alexander v. Stewart, 23 Ark. 118; King v. Clay, 34 Ark. 300."
Summary of this case from Ozment v. MannOpinion
October, 1915.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.