From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talbot v. McDonald

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 2, 2016
No. 14-35835 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-35835

11-02-2016

LIONEL TALBOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT A. McDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 9:14-cv-00127-DLC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Lionel Talbot appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action seeking veterans' benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Naffe v. Frey, 789 F.3d 1030, 1035 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because the Veterans' Judicial Review Act precludes district court jurisdiction over claims relating to or affecting veterans' benefits decisions. See Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki, 678 F.3d 1013, 1025 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

Talbot's pending request regarding the February 26, 2015 order, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Talbot v. McDonald

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 2, 2016
No. 14-35835 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Talbot v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL TALBOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERT A. McDONALD, Secretary of…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

No. 14-35835 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 2016)