From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Talamantes v. Acosta

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Nov 30, 2010
No. 08-10-00131-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-10-00131-CV

November 30, 2010.

Appeal from 388th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, (TC # 2009CM8200).

Before CHEW, C.J., McCLURE, and RIVERA, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On October 7, 2010, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant that her brief was past due and that if she failed to file a motion for extension of time, it would appear to the Court that she no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The clerk advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal unless any party could show grounds for continuing it by October 17, 2010. To this date, no one has responded to the clerk's notice.

This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant has failed to file her brief in the time prescribed and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure to do so. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Talamantes v. Acosta

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Nov 30, 2010
No. 08-10-00131-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Talamantes v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:MARIBEL TALAMANTES, Appellant, v. RENE ACOSTA, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

No. 08-10-00131-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2010)