From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

February, 1929.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Finch, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.; Dowling, P.J., and Finch, J., dissent upon the ground that it affirmatively appears by the testimony of the plaintiff's own witness, the accountant, that the plaintiff's duty in respect to the returned checks, as laid down in Stumpp v. Bank of New York ( 212 App. Div. 608), had not been discharged. [ 132 Misc. 322.]


Determination affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Takenaka v. Bankers Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN K. TAKENAKA, Respondent, v. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1929

Citations

225 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)