From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TAIT v. SWEETBAUM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

July, 1932.


Order denying motion of defendant Sweetbaum to dismiss amended complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Paul v. Fargo ( 84 App. Div. 9) and Sachs v. Weinstein (208 id. 360). Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., concurs on the ground that the plaintiff in this action was not a party to the divorce action. She came into the case voluntarily and, therefore, was not maliciously prosecuted.


Summaries of

TAIT v. SWEETBAUM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

TAIT v. SWEETBAUM

Case Details

Full title:ALFREDA TAIT, Respondent, v. SAMUEL SWEETBAUM, Appellant, and JOSEPHINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)